Top Gun Blog

Blackstone funding brings support for Maine's rural entrepreneurship to scale

From Mass High Tech 10/17/2011

By Catherine S. Renault, principal of Innovation Policyworks

At long last: entrepreneurship support in Maine at a sustainable scale. The Blackstone Charitable Foundation announcement on Oct. 7 of a $3 million grant to Maine to support existing entrepreneurship programs has been a long time coming. But this support enables Maine to support its entrepreneurs at a level commensurate with our long-standing investment in research and development. And, since R&D without commercialization, without entrepreneurship, does not by itself create economic growth, Mainers who have been advocating the importance of entrepreneurship to the state’s growth are welcoming Blackstone with open arms. Click here to read more of this blog post.

The Wall Street Journal, Glee and MCED

Every once in a while you feel like the universe is telling you something, even if you’re not quite sure of the message. I’ve had one of those experiences in the last 24 hours, and hopefully it bodes well for MCED and Maine entrepreneurship.

In today’s Wall Street Journal, my old venture capital firm Accel Partners received its latest citation as one of the very top investors in Silicon Valley. A page C1 story listed them along with Sequoia Capital and Redpoint Ventures as having 9 IPO exits so far this year. I’m really happy for my former partners; the two founders, Jim Swartz and Arthur Patterson, were big reasons I joined in 1986 – seemingly a terrible time to enter VC, as the IPO market had peaked in ’83 and the sector was in a cyclical decline. Along with other firms we had a bit of “Kleiner envy,” as Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers on Sand Hill Road were the unrivaled VC leaders. A young associate hired after me, Jim Breyer, wanted to become the next John Doerr (and who didn’t?), Kleiner’s celebrity VC.

Now, decades later, Jim Breyer is on top of the world from his Facebook board seat, Accel Partners gets top billing in the Journal, and Kleiner Perkins didn’t even make today’s article. And I’m in Maine – where I moved in 1996 to do my a cappella entrepreneurial thing. I’d started an a cappella catalog in 1992 as something I could operate in Maine, at a time when unaccompanied singing was a really obscure niche.  The first catalog had all of 150 CDs listed.

Fast forward to last night, when the hugely popular Fox TV show Glee culminated in a show choir competition, and one of the three featured groups was a high school all male a cappella group. They performed a popular tune, dancing across the stage, to thunderous applause.  Mainstream media recognition for a cappella was a wild-eyed dream back in 1992, yet there it was last night - three years since I sold off the last piece of my business. And one of my former business partners, Deke Sharon, is music director of The Sing-Off, an a cappella competition reality TV show on NBC that will run weekly this fall. Weekly a cappella on network television!

So I’ve been fortunate to be early in associating with organizations and trends that went on to national recognition after I left. I’m hoping that the third time is a charm, and that MCED and Maine entrepreneurship will reach similar heights while I’m still involved. I see huge potential here in Maine, with no more daunting obstacles than VC faced in 1986, or a cappella in 1992.  We’ll get things accelerating here soon.

Starting with Top Gun Maine this fall. The application deadline is a week from today: July 15. Let’s get going with the next Big Thing: scalable innovation based Maine entrepreneurship!

Simplify Your Way to MVP

By Don Gooding

I spent last week in Orono being trained on Innovation Engineering, so I paid attention when I received the weekly email missive today from Doug Hall, originator of Innovation Engineering. He was extolling the virtues of simplifying - products, meetings, processes. Focus on the most important things and do them really well, while saying "no" to a thousand extraneous things.

Much easier said than done. I am always making things more complicated.

I connected this notion to the Silicon Valley concept of launching with a Minimum Viable Product (MVP). The primary reason for starting with an MVP is risk management: you spend as few development dollars as possible prior to testing the product with real customers ("Fail Fast, Fail Cheap").

 However, I realized that this act of simplifying your product also has the benefit of focusing your attention on a few things your innovative product or service does, and by focusing, you hopefully can do them very well (since that's the only thing your baby product can do at first).

So starting with an MVP is the right thing to do for multiple reasons. ------------ Lean Development and Innovation Engineering are two of the frameworks taught in Top Gun Maine.

Applications are due by July 15.

5 Minutes with Attorney Karin Gregory

Partner: Furman, Gregory Deptula, LLC

Practice Areas: Corporate: Entity Formation, Intellectual Property, Corporate Management, Commercial Transactions Finance, Private Equity: Private Financings and Private Investment Funds, Alternative Investment Representation, Merger & Acquisitions and Other Liquidation Events

Ms. Gregory's career spans over 25 years in the healthcare field, as a basic scientist, healthcare administrator, lawyer and venture capitalist.

1. When should an entrepreneur file for a patent and/or trademark?

I recommend that an inventor file for a provisional patent before any public disclosure is made. For a trademark, either to secure the mark before it has been used in commerce, or soon after you can demonstrate that it is being used in commerce.

2. Do I need an attorney to file my trademark and/ or patent application?

In either case, the USPTO can assist in the initial filing, but the inventor should do some preliminary searching to see about prior art in the cases of patents and trademark applications or registrations already on file . Subsequent to the first filing of a patent, the invention should seek a patent attorney to ensure that the claims are well prepared. In the case of a trademark, once an office action is received, it is very useful to get some guidance and advice on how to reply. In either case, using an experienced IP lawyer will make the process go more smoothly.

3. How can an entrepreneur compete with, or "design around," a patent?

That's a very hard and complex question that requires a review of existing art, and even if there is an opportunity to avoid infringement, it is likely depending upon the industry, to be concerned about another company bringing suit for infringement. You need to have an enforcement and a mitigation strategy in place if the technology might have such risks. Trademarks, on the other hand, afford a company an opportunity to use the same mark in a different industry or for a different purpose so as to argue the ability to use a very similar mark that will not confuse the public if both are used in commerce.

4. If my patent is pending, is the information in it available for public consumption?

In the US, a provisional is only good at the present time for 12 months, and then a full application must be filed for the work to remain able to claim the priority date of the provisional filing. The application currently becomes public after 18 months, with some exceptions. Outside of the US, the patent applications are public almost immediately.

5. Am I violating a patent when the patent is written so vaguely that the patent covers a wide range of products?

If the patent is written vague, those claims will not likely be issued. Generally you should have an opinion about a possible infringement, so that there are no facts to support a later claim of willful infringement.

6. Should you trademark your brand name?

Trademarks are good for products, and positioning a company's name/logo, in order to have the public identify it the product with the company's name..such as the red bullseye for Target. A tag line or service type company would also do the same-Nike-"Just do it". Technically, that is a servicemark.

Top Gun Announces the Class of 2010!

The Top Gun program is pleased to announce this year’s class:

• Janet Eugley – EchoHeart, LLC

• Kevin Grant – VetEnvoy, Inc.

• Tom Hall - Hall Web Services

• Amy Ireland - Zum Sport, LLC

• Ogden Morse -AcademicMerit, LLC

• Christopher Stickney –MTK-Technology Group

• Sergei Breus, Mary Alice Hurvitt - Maine Blue Stream Power

• Steve Brown - Pure Secure, LLC

• Beth George -Spelt Right, Inc.

• Steve Jordan, David Hinson – Benevoltek, Inc.

• Scott Moffat - VFG Energy Systems

• Adrianne Zahner - Turtle Love Co.

“The Top Gun advisory board and I were exceedingly pleased with the high caliber of applicants for this year’s program and all very excited to get underway,” stated Steve Bazinet, MCED Executive Director. “Combined we have over three dozen mentors committed to the program and service providers such as Bernstein Shur, Macdonald Page, Verrill Dana, Preti Flaherty, Berry Talbot Royer, Furman Gregory, Jensen Baird, Pierce Atwood, Eaton Peabody, Drummond Woodsum, and the Renaissance Executive Forums offering pro bono hours and sponsorship. In addition to these private sector resources, without the financial support of the Department of Economic and Community Development and the Maine Small Business Development Center, these Top Gun participants would not enjoy the same level of benefit from the program that they enjoy today”. To view detailed summaries of the participants: http://www.mcedtopgun.biz/graduates.

Top Gun applications coming to a close June 25!

 

Once again, we have received some very promising applications from some intriguingly innovative ventures. It’s time to put Maine back on the grid and introduce the rest of the region to our talent and vision. The Top Gun program continues to receive a great deal of support from both the private and public sectors in the form of mentors and financial contribution.  I am really pumped about this year’s curriculum and can’t wait to introduce the class of 2010.

If interested in applying, don’t delay any further, http://www.mcedtopgun.biz/topgunapplication

Business incubators uniquely positioned to spark job creation

By Steve Bazinet

As local, state and national government agencies examine ways to create jobs and turn around the struggling economy, business incubation features prominently in the discussion. For 13 years, the Maine Center for Enterprise Development (MCED), a private, not-for-profit and Maine’s first business incubator, has been helping entrepreneurs turn their ideas into viable businesses, promoting innovation and creating jobs. Some of MCEDs’ better known recent graduates include:

AccelGolf – William Sulinski ORPC – Chris Sauer
CrossRate Technologies – Zack Conover   iBec Creative – Becky Stockbridge

As any entrepreneur can attest, starting a new business is not an easy task. Most business owners know every detail of their product or service, but many lack all of the skills necessary to turn their ideas into successful ventures. MCED is uniquely positioned to help entrepreneur’s access resources through the incubator, business community, local colleges and universities, and other business assistance programs to help them develop the skills they need to grow successful, innovative ventures.

 There is significant interest within the state for people to connect. All they need is a reason to connect and a group to provide context for connecting. Like many others, I have faith in the ability of entrepreneurs to jump-start our sagging economy by generating revenue and creating new jobs. Many times, however, they need a guiding hand to help them turn their ideas into viable businesses, particularly during times of economic turmoil. By focusing on developing a new generation of entrepreneurs – most of whom have ties to the state – MCED is helping to build companies that will create jobs and spark economic growth in the region for years to come.

There has been a renewed energy around the program, beginning last year, by the Top Gun mentorship effort, which attracted over 80 different individuals and organizations that gave back to the program in some meaningful manner. We are trying, in a difficult economic environment, to sustain an organization, which encourages and supports entrepreneurialism. We have expanded the scope of our offering, and we are aggressively trying to encourage business growth in Maine by getting the private sector more involved in mentoring innovative start-ups. Since we operate on a small budget and our strategic plan for this year expanded the scope of the organization, we therefore are going to need more support, in terms of leadership and finances.

A 2008 study conducted by consulting firm Grant Thornton for the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration found that business incubators produce new jobs at a low cost to the government. The report, Construction Grants Program Impact Assessment Report, found that for every $10,000 in EDA funds invested in business incubation programs, an estimated 47 to 69 local jobs are generated. As a result, business incubators create jobs at far less cost than do other EDA investments, such as roads and bridges, industrial parks, commercial buildings, and sewer and water projects. In fact, the study found that incubators provide up to 20 times more jobs than community infrastructure projects at a federal cost per job of between $126 and $144, compared with between $744 and $6,972 for other infrastructure projects. Although business incubation is still a relatively new industry, programs around the world have racked up impressive results that demonstrate the important role incubators play in stimulating economic growth and creating jobs. Like many others, I have faith in the ability of entrepreneurs to jump-start our sagging economy by generating revenue and creating new jobs.

But many times, they need a guiding hand to help them turn their ideas into viable businesses, particularly during times of economic crises. The world’s existing network of business incubation programs – and the many new incubators under development – can assist entrepreneurs in growing new businesses that can help put many people back to work.

Now is not the time to cut back on one of our foremost job creators. Thankfully, our private sector partners recognize that. As government agencies at all levels continue to debate how to revive the economy, it’s important that incubators – a critical component of the entrepreneurial support infrastructure that have proven themselves to be significant generators of new jobs – be at the forefront of these discussions. Clearly, we need to target our investments to those projects that will have the greatest return and create the greatest number of jobs: business incubators.

We hope you will join the effort in whatever way you can. Please blog, email, tweet and generally help spread the word.

Steve Bazinet President, Maine Center for Enterprise Development
 (p) 207-228-8525;
(c) 207-749-8355
sbazinet@mced.biz

How did Top Gun start?

I usually don't write blog posts, but I'm excited about Top Gun applications opening today. A number of people have asked me the story behind Top Gun -- so I decided to tell it here. You can apply for Top Gun here and view the schedule of important dates for the program are here.

It all started November 12, 2008 when the Office of Innovation convened some of the economic development leaders in the state to explore the creation of a leadership and entrepreneurial development program that would theoretically match up to 10 high-growth potential entrepreneurs with best-in-class training, resources and mentors. At the time, I had just assumed the position of Director at MCED in July and was really wet behind the ears in the world of economic development.

This was simply a brainstorming session to take a look at what another program - KTEC Pipeline had created in Kansas. As I listened to the description of the KTEC program, I remember asking the consultant who helped develop it “is this similar to the Navy’s Top Gun program for its top aviators?” Of course he confirmed it was and the name stuck with me.

I don’t know if I was the only one, but I decided that Maine needed a program like KTEC Pipeline and that I wanted to create Top Gun for Maine. So, I decided I was going to do just that. Now, I just needed the support of the private sector in Maine to rally around the idea.

I began by asking people I respected “what’s missing from the current offering, what they would find of benefit?” I was told that companies were unprepared for the rigors of a start-up, lacking in managerial talent to execute their plan, and unprepared when it came to presenting their business model to potential sources of capital. In effect, they didn’t know what they didn’t know.

There was also a question of the quality and quantity of Maine based businesses to invest in. I remember being told that if we could create a program that addressed those issues, then we would have a successful program deemed worthy of support and recognition. That’s not to say the goal of the program was to get funding for its participants. It wasn’t. The goal has always been to develop the entrepreneur, who will, in-turn develop our states future innovative businesses – thus attracting talent and capital.

Being new to this world of economic development, somewhat strong minded and determined to make a difference, I approached eleven individuals who I wanted to help me create this program. I then met with the Maine Technology Institute in early February 2009 and Applied for a Cluster Feasibility grant later that month. Our challenge was to demonstrate that there was strong private and investor support, as well as strong support from the entrepreneur’s themselves, both existing and prospective, for such a program. I remember being told “the key will be getting meaningful private sector support”.

On the heels of this meeting, two early supporters - Matt Burns and Lib Butler organized a breakfast meeting with a dozen local influential’s to discuss the need for a program like Top Gun. I was encouraged by this initial showing of outreach and support. There was just some doubt that we could pull it off. Questions remained: “Were there really enough Top Gun caliber candidates in the state? Could we really find the support in the way of mentors and service providers? How would the program succeed where others had failed?”

We were given the opportunity to develop and pilot the program in March and awarded a Cluster Feasibility award for $50k. Without their belief that this kind of program had to be given a chance, Top Gun would not have been possible. Thank you to the Maine Technology Institute.

In the summer of 2009, with the help of a committed advisory board, I began meeting with the entrepreneur and professional community and asked them to collaborate with us in supporting the launch of Top Gun in September 2010. The results were incredible. We received huge support from an amazing list of experienced entrepreneurs willing to act as mentors. In total, over 80 individuals and organizations elected to materially support Top Gun in some meaningful way.

That’s how Top Gun began. Applications open for Top Gun 2010 today: May 03, 2010 and the program starts in Aug 2010. If you’re an innovative entrepreneur, you should consider applying here.